INTERVIEW WITH LETICIA EL HALI OBEID BY BECCA ALBEE
Leticia El Halli Obeid is a
visual artist working and living in C—rdoba, Argentina. Her work consists of
sculpture, video, photography, performance, and installation. She has also worked in collaboration
with musicians in order to create video components for live performance. El Halli Obeid is a regular contributor
to Fe de Rata, a themed biweekly
online magazine that covers local theater, literature, visual arts, and
politics. The most recent issue was
a collection of writings and visual art in response to/discussions surrounding
war. http://www.federata.com.ar/ This
interview was conducted via email in English May-2003.
BA: Leticia,
can you give a little of your familyÕs background?
LO: I was born in
Cordoba, while my parents were studying at University here. 3 years later
(1978), they decided to move to the town where my mother was born and raised,
since there was jobs and more tranquility and safety for them. The point is
that my parents were militants and persecution of the militar government was getting too near. Their case was a sort of an internal
exile, quite common at that time. Many other militants chose other countries to live, like Italy, Spain, Sweden, France. Fewer used to go to U.S., or in South
America, Peru.
But in the little town it was like being in another country...only much more boring!
BA: What is your definition
of creative protest?
L0: Protest is the open expression of
someone who does not agree with a certain state of things. To distinguish it of
mourning: Someone brings a particular issue to public domain, someone makes a
statement, expressing disagreement.
O.K. It has to do then, basically, with an instance of being or becoming
public. Becoming public is
something art is dealing with all the time, isnÕt it? Protest is the other huge
issue in the arts. IsnÕt art a protest against reality itself, by definition?
All these issues quickly get
muddy because of two big clichŽs: the idea that only "protest art"
(as we say here) has political content; and that such a content is always
leftist. This
"syllogism" has a partial truth: normally it is only the left that is
interested in protesting, for the simple reason that it is usually the minority, although it tries to represent
the majority (in the sense that we always have a majority of people in
disadvantaged conditions)! At
least this has been the situation of the left in Argentina traditionally.
Of course we can not deny
that there are many degrees of violence and efficiency in a protest, and that
there is a remarkable difference between languages and messages; the Cul de
sac is that most of the expressions
of protest tend to be easily absorbed by the system which the protests is
directed to. On one side the arts
try to escape that situation turning more and more hermetic, but this again
ends up working as a way of stating differences and all types of
discriminations between the spectators. Anyway, we must try not to see the
phenomenon as a polarity. I have hope in our own capacities of being confused!
BA: What are some
creative protests that have taken place historically in
Argentina?
LO: The story of creative
protest is rich here, though quite bitter. Starting with our first book (our
Divine Comedy! but in the XIX), Martin
Fierro, which is the story of a gaucho who lives totally out of the law, and talks about
his marginal condition, followed by the discussion that crossed the 20's based
on the problematic identity and expressed in the polarity "politic art /
formalist avant garde", the debate of the 40's around figuration
(tradition) /abstraction (modernity), the 60's with national/international.
Probably the highest point were the radical experiences of a group of artists
who denounced the conditions of starvation in the whole province of Tucuman, in
the 60Õs. This event called "Tucum‡n arde" ("Tucum‡n on
fire") was censored by the government; most of those artists renounced to
art after it.
After 1976, when the last
and bloodiest dictatorship in our history started, "politic art"
became practically forbidden and persecuted. Music precisely illustrates the entire process: first people
engaged in political militance saw in folk music a focus of resistance and a
medium of protest (since it was a language suitable for the desire of building
an Òown identityÓ) all this in opposition to foreign rock & pop products
(the Carpenters, the Bee Gees...).
By the end of the dictatorship Ðcaused, amongst other things, by the
defeat on the war with Great Britain Ð the military government prohibited music
sung in English. This was a big push for the local music, helping Ðagainst the
primary intentions of the military Ð to grow a movement of ÒProtest musicÓ in
Spanish which paradoxically took its stile mixing influences of figures like
Bob Dylan, Leonard Cohen and many American folk
musicians. Funny... Those
Argentine musicians became the heroes of anticipation, reputation quickly
turned into a sort of post-war shame. The immediately following genre was a pop
movement which only wanted to talk about simple daily life, small things,
dancing and having fun, parallel to a more politically aggressive punk
movement....
BA: What is your
relationship to these artists/movements?
LO: I was born in 1975, and like many of my
generation I received all this in an unconscious level: the mixture between
various folk influences, the Ô80s and its glamour, sentimental love songs, and
the re-opening to the world (1990 found us connected to the world«s music). I
still remember the simultaneous feelings of freedom and betrayal when I bought
my first tape: Madonna«s ÒTrue BlueÓ, with that horrible introduction of
ÒspanglishÓ, La Isla Bonita.A
Add one more thing to the
coctail: tons of fears. 27 years
after that tragic 24 march we are still dealing with all those fears. Argentina lost in that period 30,000
young persons (the survivors of that hunt would say Òthey were the brightest,
the smartest and bravest ones, our most precious headsÓ), the so called ÒdissapearedÓ -by the
government. That might explain why during all this time we haven«t had strong
visible (public) movements of protest in arts. But this difficulty to define or perceive them has to do
also with the increasing difficulty in defining public and private,
basically...mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm, huge issue.
BA: Last year, when the Argentine economy
collapsed, was there a visible
artist response? How did you respond? I am interested in the photographic
workshop and the birth of
this web magazine you are involved in.
Also the
last issue was based on
politics, bush, etc.
LO: 20th december
2001, Argentina: the worst politic, economical crisis in our full-of-crisis
history... being connected to the world«s
music had a huge prize, it seems. 10
years of brutal neoliberal policies and globalization left a devastated
reality. Was there an artist movement right away? Not at all. The first months
we spent a lot of time trying to react, to understand, to adapt to that
all-day-changing reality and during that time, art itself looked quite absurd
in this context. For the art scene
it was very scary as artists are used to survive working on those skills and
languages that here are mainly related to visual arts Ðphotography, design,
advertising, teaching, writing, cultural journalism, etc.- and it seemed those
professions were about to dissapear under the pressure of increasing poverty,
like luxuries of other age. Well, they didn«t. They just became much more
expensive to accomplish...and much worse paid. Artists are slowly starting to
respond to this, questioning old ideas, habits, and beliefs.
BA: When I think of your work I think of a
more quiet protest. It is
speaking to politics,
culture, etc but in a subtle or minimalist mannerÉ
LO: IÕm deeply concerned
with this idea: is there really an individual life, limit between
Òinside-outsideÓ, individual-social life? Or is it time to admit we are not
close cells, and our differences are not that big, outside the importance we
want to see in Òbeing uniqueÓ? But, I don«t want my work to illustrate
ideas. So at times I feel trapped,
not knowing how to go further. I
feel I have many things to say, to celebrate, to protest against, and at the
same time I like that very pop attitude,
not approving nor condemnig facts, enjoying and hating and forgiving all
together. I like contradiction, and I can«t help feeling afraid of the search
for coherent dogmas, which is very proper of militants. Sometimes I see clearly how art shows,
as a transparent box, the way the world turns. For instance, in Argentine arts
it is really funny to see how an elite of rich people here adopt languages of the middle class in Europe or
U.S. , then the terms eventually spread beyond the upper class, it is just a
matter of time. In a wider sense,
here many people dream of having houses with gardens like American gardens (In
Argentina gated communities are called Countries.) , and private schools are called (in english) ÒHigh
SchoolsÓ like in the movies of the
Ô80s. Sometimes I have the
impression we are recycling languages that do not match our bodies and
gestures!!! My work is made of
those questions and fantasies.
C—rdoba, 16th
may, 2003.
becca albee is a visual
artist currently working in new york city.